I think they're thinking that its a little risky, because... just look at Epic with the Unreal Engine. There are only a few devs I can think of that can acutally make that engine spin on its head like Epic does, the rest who use it seemingly only believe in the cut and paste method.
yeah they should do that before licensing it out. Achievements are a game within themselves and its sooo last-gen not to have them.
you're just blinded by your fanboyism
MS's 3rd party support is just immense, but Sony should just keep on grinding out those 1st party exclusives, that will be their bread and butter for sure. MS could learn from this and I think they have. But like I said Sony impresses me with the exclusives, I may not like the Sony fanboy propaganda but I certainly love what Sony is doing with the PS3 software.
While I'll agree U2 is PROBABLY going to be the best looking console game for a little while, I disagree as it being more technical than Gears 2. There is just too much going on in Gears 2(online) with the character animations and the movements all while providing the unparralled textures(console). This was another reason KZ2 just didn't do it for me, there was just too much inconsistencies going on with the textures and blur(online).
has anything to do with the fact that the PS3 was the lead platform and it looks worse than the 360's version.
I can't believe people still play KZ2...
sorry, but the Coduit is the best looking game on the Wii at the moment.
...I can tell you're not ready for the future of gaming, which is headed towards Virtual Reality...VR simulators. As long as no extinct level event happens.
that you're defeating the purpose of hating him when you click on the articles and then go on to comment on his articles. Damn....giant *facepalm*
My thoughts exactly! Its like these clowns want attention for their little mishaps, I don't know what they're trying to get out of all this. And then the guy has the nerve to diss PSN in the comment section, while replying to someone else.
someone elses opinion a lie. For me at the moment the best looking console game is Uncharted 2, hell, the first Uncharted looked better than KZ2. KZ2 was just a blurry game that had some beautiful moments. I don't even think the game is as technical as Gears 2 especially in the online department were the blur is even worse in KZ2. Overall though, I did have some fun with the game, especially on my Sony Bravia...
Don't they have their own eyes?
Because I had reached the General ranking, but when I played it I was wondering what the fuss was about concerning graphics. The game looked and played average and I thought it was suppose to be this technical benchmark. This is why I don't fall for any of this gaming hype fanboys like feeding to the masses who aren't fanboys.
But this freaking game is taking too long to come out, but mine is paid for so.... w/e.
Isn't on that website's list?
Is that really the question you want to ask me? Look at your reply again and if this helps, I'm a General in KZ2, so if anything my motor skills have surpassed that of which a controller demands. Anyway I'm looking at my first post and what I was trying to say was anything as good as the Wii remote or better will obviously "pwn" two thumb sticks...in first person that is.
Sony made their motion controller compatible with fpss. Dual Shock for these kind of games are a no-go for I.
The tech wasn't available when the Wii was introduced, so why are people still complaining about it? I don't get it, did I miss something?
Nintendo is the Teacher and the other two are the Students. I got to give respect to MS for acknowledging Nintendo for the inspiration, but Sony has yet to do so. Nintendo is Shaolin while Sony plays the part of Wu Tang. In a couple of years Sony fanboys will talk about how Sony invented Motion sensing this gen...I'm kidding.